Editor’s Note: The following article was originally published by Shauneen Miranda and Ariana Figueroa on News from the States, a part of States Newsroom on October 24, 2025.
The position is a reversal from the department’s earlier stance, which pledged to use contingency funds to cover the program short term.
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Agriculture said in a memo Friday the agency’s contingency fund cannot legally be used to provide food assistance benefits for more than 42 million people in November, as the government shutdown drags on.
The position is a reversal from the department’s earlier stance, according to a since-deleted copy of the USDA’s Sept. 30 shutdown plan that said the department would use its multiyear contingency fund to continue paying Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, benefits during the ongoing shutdown.
SNAP has about $6 billion in the contingency fund — short of the roughly $9 billion needed to cover a full month of the program, putting November benefits in jeopardy.
SNAP has about $6 billion in the contingency fund.
Because of a stalemate in Congress over a stopgap spending bill, the government shut down on Oct. 1 without new SNAP funding appropriated.
The memo, which was first reported by Axios on Friday, said states would not be reimbursed if they use their own funds to provide benefits.
“There is no provision or allowance under current law for States to cover the cost of benefits and be reimbursed,” the memo says, while also noting that “the best way for SNAP to continue is for the shutdown to end.”
Discrepancy with shutdown plan
The memo also says the contingency fund is meant for natural disasters and similar emergencies, not for a lack of appropriations.
But the USDA’s Sept. 30 contingency plan contradicts that, appearing to greenlight the use of the contingency fund to bridge a lapse in funding.
“Congressional intent is evident that SNAP’s operations should continue since the program has been provided with multi-year contingency funds that can be used for State Administrative Expenses to ensure that the State can also continue operations during a Federal Government shutdown,” according to the plan. “These multi-year contingency funds are also available to fund participant benefits in the event that a lapse occurs in the middle of the fiscal year.”
The USDA’s contingency plan is no longer online, but is accessible through an internet archive.
The USDA’s contingency plan is no longer online.
After providing States Newsroom with the memo Friday afternoon, the USDA did not immediately respond to a follow-up inquiry about the discrepancy between Friday’s memo and its contingency plan.
In the memo, the USDA said transferring money to SNAP from other sources “would pull away funding for school meals and infant formula.”
The agency said it has shuffled funds from other sources to cover several nutrition programs during the shutdown, including the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, or WIC, as well as the National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and the Child and Adult Care Food Program.
Dems call on Rollins to tap into fund
Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said last week that because of the ongoing shutdown the government would not have enough funds to deliver November SNAP benefits.
Friday morning, U.S. House Democrats, like nearly all of their Senate counterparts and the Republican chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, urged Rollins to not only use the contingency fund, but to redirect other money as well to cover the $3 billion shortfall.
“A potential lapse in benefits would be felt by Americans of all ages and affect every corner and congressional district in the country,” according to the letter from more than 200 House Democrats.
In a separate letter sent to Rollins on Wednesday, 46 Senate Democrats voiced concerns that the USDA told states to stop processing SNAP payments for November.
“A potential lapse in benefits would be felt by Americans of all ages.”
“We were deeply disturbed to hear that the USDA has instructed states to stop processing SNAP benefits for November and were surprised by your recent comments that the program will ‘run out of money in two weeks,’” according to the letter. “In fact, the USDA has several tools available which would enable SNAP benefits to be paid through or close to the end of November.”
The chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Republican Susan Collins of Maine, also urged Rollins in a Thursday letter to “consider all available options in accordance with federal law to ensure that this vital nutrition assistance continues, including the use of contingency funds and looking at the viability of partial payments or any transfer authority you may have.”
Benefits could be slow even if a deal reached
States have been told by the agency to hold off on submitting SNAP benefit requests to for federal approval. Food banks and pantries are already bracing for the increased need, including in Iowa, where more than 270,000 residents rely on SNAP each month.
Even if Congress immediately reached a deal to end the shutdown, the time needed to process the payments and make them available for recipients would likely delay the distribution of SNAP benefits, and state officials have warned recipients of that possibility.
In West Virginia, officials said delays are expected and advised residents to seek assistance at local food pantries. Roughly 1 in 6 West Virginia residents rely on SNAP each month.
Legal requirement cited
Sharon Parrott, a White House Office of Management and Budget official during the Obama administration who now leads a left-leaning think tank, said in a Thursday statement that the USDA is legally required to use its SNAP contingency funds.
Parrott, the president of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said the multiyear contingency fund is “billions of dollars that Congress provided for use when SNAP funding is inadequate that remain available during the shutdown — to fund November benefits for the 1 in 8 Americans who need SNAP to afford their grocery bill.”
Parrott said the Trump administration could use its legal transfer authority, just as it did with WIC funding, to “supplement the contingency reserves, which by themselves are not enough to fund families’ full benefits.”
Tribuno del Pueblo brings you articles written by individuals or organizations, along with our own reporting. Bylined articles reflect the views of the authors. Unsigned articles reflect the views of the editorial board. Please credit the source when sharing: tribunodelpueblo.org. We’re all volunteers, no paid staff. Please donate at http://tribunodelpueblo.org to keep bringing you the voices of the movement because no human being is illegal.
